Source-cited profile

Gala

5 cited categories from 3 sources. Each claim below carries its source, and the region or conditions that source gives. Categories no admitted source covers are left out.

Illustrative generated artwork for the Gala profile
Illustrative generated artwork, not a cultivar reference photograph.

Cited profile evidence

Source wording is quoted as published. The history is an approved summary of its sources. A claim applies only within the scope shown with it.

Cited history

Identity and history

Cited summary

Raised by J. H. Kidd in Greytown, Wairarapa, New Zealand, about 1934, from Kidd’s Orange Red × Golden Delicious.

Source
  • NSW Department of Primary Industries, Gala
Scope
Identity and history only. These sources support no other field on this profile.
Date
accessed 2026-09-27
  • Skin and flesh

    Source wording

    “Galas can vary in color, from cream to red- and yellow-striped”
    Source
    Scope
    N.C. State Extension cultivar profile.
    Date
    accessed 2026-09-27
  • Texture and flavor

    Source wording

    “mild, sweet, and slightly tart flavor”
    “sweet-tart, but mild taste and is crispy”
    Source
    Scope
    N.C. State Extension cultivar profile.
    Date
    accessed 2026-09-27
  • Stated uses

    Source wording

    “ideal for fresh eating, salads, and cooking”
    Source
    Scope
    N.C. State Extension cultivar profile.
    Date
    accessed 2026-09-27
  • Conditioned storage

    Source wording

    “Store Gala at 38°F in CA”
    “0.5% oxygen (1% carbon dioxide) recommended for long term storage”
    “2% oxygen (1% carbon dioxide) for standard CA”
    Source
    Scope
    Hudson Valley commercial CA; source gives conditions but no fixed duration.
    Date
    accessed 2026-09-27

This profile gives no nutrient values. For general handling and where apple nutrient data is published, see How to store apples and Apple nutrition.

Separate from the cited evidence

Editorial guide ratings

In the guide, Gala reads sweet-leaning and middle texture next to the other seven profiles. None of this section is cited, and nothing above depends on it.

See all eight on the taste map

Editorial guide ratings

  • The 1–5 dot scale is relative editorial orientation for browsing these eight profiles against one another.
  • It is not culinary consensus, a lab measurement, or a source-backed cultivar fact.
  • Cited evidence is kept separate, and its source, scope, and date govern it.
  • No result here proves suitability, availability, health, or storage outcome.

How guide ratings work

Guide ratings

Relative dots: 1 = lowest here, 5 = highest here

Sweetness
4/5 (4 of 5, editorial guide rating)
Tartness
1/5 (1 of 5, editorial guide rating)
Crispness
3/5 (3 of 5, editorial guide rating)
Juiciness
4/5 (4 of 5, editorial guide rating)
Aroma
2/5 (2 of 5, editorial guide rating)

Guide shape

The same five ratings, charted

  • Sweetness: 4 of 5, editorial guide rating
  • Tartness: 1 of 5, editorial guide rating
  • Crispness: 3 of 5, editorial guide rating
  • Juiciness: 4 of 5, editorial guide rating
  • Aroma: 2 of 5, editorial guide rating

At a glance in the guide

Editorial keeping class
Medium keeping class Relative to the other seven, not a storage time or advice
Editorial rarity
1 of 5 1 is the most familiar name here, 5 the least; not availability
Editorial use tags
  • Fresh
  • Lunch
  • Kids

Browsing groupings, not tested uses

Explore all varieties